nice, but the theorem meant infinite time, not infinite monkeys
the former model would nail it some time far after the heat death of the universe, if you were putting a bet down
this model would have an infinite number of monkeys getting the complete works perfectly down from the first keystroke
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 2 Apr 2025, 5:03,
Reply)
Indeed
an infinite number of attempts trying to do anything would mean perfecting it on the first round.
Of course, then you have to filter an infinite amount of data to find it.
(
My Name was saying these words inside your head on, Wed 2 Apr 2025, 10:39,
Reply)
you could hire a temp
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 2 Apr 2025, 11:19,
Reply)
Ergodic hypothesis suggest that infinite time or infinite monkeys would be equivalent
Provided the monkeys are independent of each other.
(, Wed 2 Apr 2025, 15:22, Reply)
the esotericism
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 2 Apr 2025, 21:39,
Reply)
infinitits
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Thu 3 Apr 2025, 5:50,
Reply)
Is that connected to the double slit experiment?
(
My Name was saying these words inside your head on, Thu 3 Apr 2025, 10:18,
Reply)
You could even just have an infinite number of typewriters, no monkeys
there is always a tiny, but finite, chance that random quantum fluctuations would produce forces on the keys that type out the entire works of Shakespeare and as we all know, any finite chance, however small, in an infinite system becomes a 100% certainty to happen at least once.
You could even just have nothing, and there is about the same chance that the works would spontaneously form out of that nothing, fully printed, autographed, and bound.
(
My Name was saying these words inside your head on, Wed 2 Apr 2025, 22:02,
Reply)