Had she said or done anything on the premises which the proprietor had found just cause to eject her for, on the basis of some witnessed or anticipated criminal act, or risk to the safety of his staff, establishment, patrons, or business?
Don't get me wrong, I'm as woke as the next 'tard. But I'd expect the case for someone's removal from a public house to at least be granted some appropriate due process. There needs to be an identifiable actus reus.
The takeaway from this, however, is "Katie Hopkins pushed out of pub by crowd of men for being Katie Hopkins", which is as banal and rationally unsound a ground for disenfranchisement as her own arguments are for those she writes about.
This is a colossal own goal. The point is to be better than *precisely* this.
A good start would be to not organise in a pub (that's enough - Ed.)
(, Sat 20 Jun 2026, 12:20, Reply)
(, Sat 20 Jun 2026, 16:57, Reply)
She should be counting her lucky stars that the bar didn't have a milkshake machine.
(, Sun 21 Jun 2026, 3:20, Reply)