ISPs censoring Scorpions album cover...
This is do with the rather famous and NSFW Virgin Killer cover... (the link is completely SFW)
Now if only they could censor the music as well...
EDIT: having re-read the article, I'm slightly worried now, that anyone who DOES access the image could find themselves on some kind of "kiddie-porn looking at" list
(
Joe Scaramanga with a G-double-O-D vibration, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 13:40,
Reply)
I heard this on "Today" this morning.
It occurred to me then that, if you use Wikipedia to get your rocks off, you're probably a rubbish paedophile.
(
Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 13:47,
Reply)
Whole thing is a little bit silly...
Will this page get blocked now too, do you think ?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Phuc_Phan_Thi
(
zacherynuk @echo off, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 14:06,
Reply)
I do think this is slightly retarded
Personally, I don't find the image offensive in any way. The fact that someone may be able to knock one off to it is not reason enough for banning it, imo. I've seen hordes of naked babies on daytime tv in pampers/johnson's adverts. Should that be censored too? I'm sure some paedophiles could just as easily get their rocks off to that if they so wanted. Or beastiality people to the andrex puppy. Ffs - Nevermind album cover anyone? A baby's penis in full view. I imagine there would be quite an uproar if it war a female baby with her bits on full show.
It all seems a little knee-jerk. (ooh - potential innuendo! Censor me already).
(
thiswasmyclone, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 14:32,
Reply)
Silly
This isn't blocked.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bow_Wow_Wow
Annabell Lwin was 14. That said I do think Malcolm McLaren is a twunt.
(, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 22:37, Reply)