and notorious for this, as well as taking money from your ccard quietly, then telling you some time later about your new non-refundable purchases they've made for you.
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:41, Reply)
This happened mainly because the law allowed Schillings to step past the author of an article and instead threaten the company hosting his website (thereby allowing them to silence a critic of their client without any of that 'day in court' nonsense).
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:46, Reply)
If you don't pay enough, the user agreement allows it and the company's a bit hooky they'll drop you like a stone at the slightest whiff of any complaint.
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 14:58, Reply)