I think this one works quite well compared to others.
(, Fri 23 Jan 2009, 16:22, Reply)
I guess I missed the meeting!
Have you got a Link?
(, Fri 23 Jan 2009, 16:27, Reply)
then builds a track around it. the bandwagon right now is to play accapellas of well known songs through it. it's a free download from here:
asia.cnet.com/downloads/pc/swinfo/0,39000587,50002358r-39580108s,00.htm
there's a lot of potential with this thing, but as c_kick suggested, we might be ushering in a new era of unimaginable shite.
(, Fri 23 Jan 2009, 16:34, Reply)
a song that goes to number 1 in the charts and makes a small fortune using songsmith, who owns the rights? Me or microsoft?
(, Fri 23 Jan 2009, 17:34, Reply)
the track itself is probably microsoft owned, with your writing credits. essentially you'd still get the royalties, unless microsoft objected. i doubt they would, though, as it'd be a massive PR disaster.
if you wrote a song using nothing but a drum machine as backing, it'd be more or less the same thing.
(, Fri 23 Jan 2009, 18:10, Reply)
that count towards copyright ownership are the words and melody, which you are providing in this case.
Sometimes a really distinctive musical hook might count, such as the guitar in 'Satisfaction' by the Rolling Stones, but I doubt that would happen here.
(, Fri 23 Jan 2009, 23:23, Reply)
Its PC only but they dont care about reality in adland.
I can picture the meeting 'lets make it cool and creative' 'how?' ..um..we'll stick a mac laptop in there' 'but..' 'shut up giles...just shut up'
(, Fri 23 Jan 2009, 19:06, Reply)