Let's try to unload those questions a little, shall we?
b) Why did supersonic interceptor planes take a route over the ocean which is what they're supposed to do unless war has been declared?
c) Why did an unarmed C130 transport plane with a top speed of 340 knots not do anything to stop a Boeing 757 travelling at 460 knots?
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:44, Reply)
good points
fair enough
I'm not claiming a grand conspiracy, just pointing out soemthing I found interseting.
(
Crap Little Monkey Deathstar, so good they built it twice, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:48,
Reply)
I think Charlie Brooker said it best
www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/14/september11.usa
(
Mster Johnny Ekstrom, now that's a name, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:53,
Reply)
Thats great
I know Brooker is something of a legend but I've not read anything of his before, I shall do so in the future :-)
(
Hellzapoppin, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 13:19,
Reply)
Moreover...
d) Even if the C130 had been armed and faster, what - precisely - was it supposed to do, given that, while the plane was still in the air, the passengers may well have survived (as per normal hijackings), but shooting it down would condemn them all?
(
Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:42,
Reply)
Not great quality, but this seems apt...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bs7EqlLiSs&feature=related
(
The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:52,
Reply)