Read page 2.
b) Questions why the planes sent in intercept the planes were sent on a overly long route
c) Questions why there was a plane follwoing the pentagon hijack that didn;t do anything.
Conspiracy or plain incompetence?
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:02, Reply)
b) Why did supersonic interceptor planes take a route over the ocean which is what they're supposed to do unless war has been declared?
c) Why did an unarmed C130 transport plane with a top speed of 340 knots not do anything to stop a Boeing 757 travelling at 460 knots?
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:44, Reply)
fair enough
I'm not claiming a grand conspiracy, just pointing out soemthing I found interseting.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:48, Reply)
www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/14/september11.usa
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 10:53, Reply)
I know Brooker is something of a legend but I've not read anything of his before, I shall do so in the future :-)
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 13:19, Reply)
d) Even if the C130 had been armed and faster, what - precisely - was it supposed to do, given that, while the plane was still in the air, the passengers may well have survived (as per normal hijackings), but shooting it down would condemn them all?
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:42, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bs7EqlLiSs&feature=related
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 11:52, Reply)
www.loosechange911.com/
everything you want to know.
Oh and the trade towers were demolished because the dude who owned them had a billion $$ bill to clean all the asbestos off both towers internal structure.
etc etc
Full length video on Youtube.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 13:35, Reply)
so bad they had to re-edit and repackage it when people started calling it for what it was, with facts.
(, Mon 20 Jul 2009, 14:38, Reply)