
and he was going to humour her, but wasnt aloud too...
I think you are right too, it should not be allowed to be on telly. There are/were some great religious programming this year (the history of the bible, the history of christianity) all very well balanced (apart from Anne Widdecombe, who is as batty as Mr McBat winning the battiest bat competition at Battington) and a joy to watch.
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:31, Reply)

which can be done well - and religious programmes?
(It's analogous to the difference between rock music made by Christians, and Christian rock. The former stands at least a chance of not sucking - although, admittedly, the existence of Good Charlotte, Sixpence None the Richer and Feeder count against that claim...)
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:36, Reply)

and kinda my point before I got distracted by a shiny thing...
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:46, Reply)

..why is it even assumed that the religious opinion should have its voice on tv at all? Why is it deemed important enough to have it's own slot? I dont see a pro-muslim hour, or a a pro-hindu show, or a program to promote the idea that lemonade is a cure for aids, or some such other nonsense that is plucked from thin air.
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:36, Reply)

bit as much as I am a Dawkins grade atheist, I believe that religion has had a big hand in how the world has been shaped. I find churches and cathedrals breath taking, and also have the viewpoint that I must understand something before I believe/not believe it. I also find how and why people believe things interesting also. Just a me thing I s'pose :-)
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:41, Reply)

Cue endless stream of none-too-bright people going, "But atheism's just a religion, too"...
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:50, Reply)

kinda. I made a similar comment about churches and such, now she thinks I am a closet believer, and is going to buy me a cross for my birthday.
(I know what you meant btw:-)
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:55, Reply)

in ye olde times.
( , Tue 22 Jun 2010, 12:10, Reply)