![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
This type of side stepping gets me sooooooo angry.
If I am elected under AV, the first law will be that any politican who is asked a straight forward yes/no question will be hit on the head with a hammer until they give a yes/no answer.
( , Tue 3 May 2011, 13:10, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Like this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=3z-a5hy7QO8&feature=related
( , Tue 3 May 2011, 13:14, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
was going to be this.
(also- Cameron, what a slimy cunt &c...)
( , Tue 3 May 2011, 13:51, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
that each time David Cameron pointed out the flaws in John Humphries' arguments, the latter responded by talking over his guest?
( , Tue 3 May 2011, 14:19, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But is it not because otherwise the little sod would continue to talk until the time slot was over? (Nixon/Frost first interview)
John Humph normally does let people speak if he feels they are answering the question or making a valid point, rather than trying to tell us lies.
JH: Do you endorse the lies told by the 'No' campaigners?
DC: That is not the question......
JH: Yes it fucking well is, I fucking well asked it, I should fucking well know.
( , Tue 3 May 2011, 14:35, Share, Reply)