just because it involves the internet
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 9:43, Reply)
something that you've indulged in in your last post on /board
www.b3ta.com/board/10717038
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 9:45, Reply)
"TELL IT TO THE JUDGE!" Damn.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:11, Reply)
And why is my lovely otherwise quiet library full of noisy people right now, when i'm trying to waste my time on b3ta?
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:26, Reply)
because he's not making any direct income from the use or copying of copywrited material...
he might be DMCA'd but nothing more...
however sir, because you are hosting the content, and also generating ad sales... you might have to tell it to the judge...
and this kid did... because it was sustained piracy... not a single photoshop image.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:27, Reply)
...that me having seen this would make me less likely to buy their commercial product? Which is surely one of the things they have to prove, unless the US system is very different? (apologies, not too hot on how their legal code works on this)
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 9:56, Reply)
You can get drunk and go drive your car into a crowded footpath and you'd get off with less.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 9:47, Reply)
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17349774
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 9:58, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:01, Reply)
You raised the point of punishment fitting the crime, and it's a crime. Perhaps i'm agreeing with you
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:06, Reply)
Maybe we're talking past each other a bit here.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:10, Reply)
I just think it's a bit unrealistic to throw six thousand years at a middle aged human being
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:17, Reply)
His sentence was over 200 years but nobody was saying "This is a farce, he'll never live that long", they were saying "Good, he'll never come out of jail alive".
As that article says, it is largely a symbolic sentence.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:20, Reply)
if somewhat of a non-sequitor in regards to the whole subject.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:06, Reply)