by his definition of the wonders of female anatomy,
if a married couple didn't want a baby, but the man didn't have a condom, he could just rape his wife. Her magic body parts would acknowledge it was a rape scenario and reject the sperm.
It's not an ideal relationship, but it would be working out how his god intended.
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Mon 20 Aug 2012, 11:25,
Reply)
He does seem to believe, for some reason,
that in the case of a genuine rape the woman's own body would reject it (whether it is the sperm or the egg that gets rejected, before or after conception, isn't entirely clear), but I don't know how you jump from that to the idea that he thinks that rape is acceptable.
It's unfortunate in that it implies that any woman who does get pregnant from rape is lying.
(
Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Mon 20 Aug 2012, 11:29,
Reply)
From this, one could extrapolate that if a man and woman didn't want a baby,
all the woman would need to do is go out and get raped, and her body would take care of disposing of the original unwanted one.
Which would therefore make rape a kind of birth control, thus greatly offending many Catholics and "Pro-Life"ers.
Westbro Baptist will start picketing dark alleys, holding placards reading "RAPE is WRONG!", which would be confusing in so many ways.
(, Mon 20 Aug 2012, 11:37, Reply)
But it's not really rape anymore if she's going out of her way to make it happen
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social, Mon 20 Aug 2012, 11:46,
Reply)
none of it makes any sense that's the beauty of it
(
Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Mon 20 Aug 2012, 11:47,
Reply)