
Galloway has a point, whatever you think about the fucker or his politics. In reality, sex is often initiated and agreed to without any verbal discusion. It starts with kissing, then fondling, then stripping off.
As much as anti-sexual violence campaigners would wish it otherwise, generally asking "May I fuck you?" or "Do you give your informed consent to have sexual relations with me?" is the exception rather than the norm of human sexual interaction.
To call intiating sex without verbal consent (allegedly) while in bed together after already having mutually consensual sex as rape does cheapen the term, as it equates people who don't ask for permission for each time they do it under the impression that it's consensual (ie, the majority of sexual encounters) with people who use physical violence or intimidation for sex.
This is just speaking in general terms. In the assange case there are a lot of other factors (one of the accusers tweeting a few hours after the rape about what a cool party she was at), the political nature of the prosecution (a known anti-rape campaigner with something to gain (in sweden the prosecutors are political appointments) who convinced the two women to change there accusation from wanting Assange to have an STI test to accusing him of rape), the leaking to the press of assange details on the prosecutors blog, the texts from the accusers saying they want to get paid (this is alleged, as the prosecution is refusing to release them), their refusal for him to be questioned of give pre-trial appearance by video link, and other factors point towards a bullshit prosecution without having to delve into consipiricy theories
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 21:50, Reply)

that verbal 'ok, we can have sex now' very rarely happens. However, is that a defense? 'She didn't say no'. Oh that's OK then.
Even if I had sex with someone and took then back to my house and went to bed, I would still defend my right to say they had non-consensual sex with me while I was asleep.
You cannot, CANNOT take anything for granted when it comes to how you feel about fucking or being fucked.
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:17, Reply)

in England they've sensibly included the "reasonable belief" element into the law. Im not saying the rape law is perfect, and there are huge problems with how rape accusers are treated in the the UK, but this shouldn't be a stick to beat people who question assanges conviction over the head with or say that all rape accusations are of equal merit whatever the circumstances
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:34, Reply)

and any 'verbal consent' argument is bollocks, you both know if you want to shag, you don't need some kind of verbal confirmation to enforce this
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:35, Reply)

I have to agree with you, Herbs, if you're asleep you cannot consent to an act you're not aware of being initiated. I don't just start having sex with my wife because I feel like it, I wake her up, get told to 'fuck off, it's three in the morning!' then go back to sleep.
But Galloway needs to shut up and die. Akin, too.
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:44, Reply)

like me, you probably give her squeeze and see how she physically responds, judging by her body language if she awake enought and into it enough before you continue. You wouldn't rush straight to fucking, but you wouldn't do the lights thing either. In sweden, you're a rapist
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:58, Reply)

and been accused of being boring.
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:37, Reply)

Jesus H Monte Christo! Boring for suggesting that? well, take sloace in the fact that at least one person agrees with you....
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:48, Reply)

have they had had sex before, or is it the first time. Had they had sex that night before? Did it happen half an hour later, or at 4 in the morning when she was dreaming of ponies?
did she wake half-way through to find he was on top of her boning away, or did she respond well to his fondling in a half-asleep sort of way that encouraged him to think it was cool, or did he wake her up and she was fully into it, but she forgot to ask him to put a condom on because she was a bit sleepy and blamed him afterwards?
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:49, Reply)

apparently some people are cool with that, personally I'd be absolutely livid.
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 22:52, Reply)

I guess what im trying to say in my usual wordy sort of way is that sexual interaction is complicated and often a little bit animalistic under normal human circumstances, and Im a bit nervous about locking someone up for 5 years if they honestly misinterpret the signals in a non violent sort of way
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 23:06, Reply)

he should give his side of the story where it's appropriate.
( , Mon 20 Aug 2012, 23:09, Reply)

I am a pony, and fiddling with my fetlock without my consent even while you're asleep is tantamount to rape.
( , Tue 21 Aug 2012, 2:45, Reply)