Yup, why on why do they not have video refs?
(
The Scrunt Wants a Dozen Pints, Mon 10 Dec 2012, 12:00,
Reply)
Indeed, why on why do they not have video refs?
(
skeltonator Needs some new daps., Mon 10 Dec 2012, 12:25,
Reply)
Video refs have always been rejected by both the players and their clubs
The whole thing's way, WAY out of control. There's too much money involved for there to be any changes. I think refs should be the law on the pitch, no ifs buts or maybes, dissent of any kind should equal an immediate red card, a two-month ban and loss of salary - but as long as we lionise these players and place them above/out of the constraints of normal behaviour and their paymasters support them even when they're blatantly in the wrong, the game will continue to fester.
(, Mon 10 Dec 2012, 12:27, Reply)
I've always loved the game (played since I was 5)
But this element is utter pish. But it'll continue if the culprits aren't deterred somehow. You can get red/yellow cards overturned after a match. Surely the opposite should be available for these big jessies. Slap a two-month ban on top of that and you'll start to see results, I think.
(
Fray Brentos *mega-belms*, Mon 10 Dec 2012, 12:05,
Reply)
Yes, but why on why do they not have video refs?
(
Fadgebadger Sweaty sumo wanks for everyone!, Mon 10 Dec 2012, 12:33,
Reply)
Then we'd have American football with a 60-minute game taking 4 hours to play.
Admittedly it works very well in rugby union.
(
Fray Brentos *mega-belms*, Mon 10 Dec 2012, 12:58,
Reply)