I am struggling to express my contempt for this article
I only got so far as the line:
"How big is an atom exactly? Know this: You can't even see it with the naked eye."
When I read this I wanted to smash the internet to tiny, weeny, smithereens - even smaller than atoms.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 21:05, Reply)
I only got so far as the line:
"How big is an atom exactly? Know this: You can't even see it with the naked eye."
When I read this I wanted to smash the internet to tiny, weeny, smithereens - even smaller than atoms.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 21:05, Reply)
Manning the science desk on a design mag must be a soul-crushing experience.
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 21:16, Reply)
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 21:16, Reply)
You two are simply not "trendy". if you were, you would see that it is a great line to pull birds
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 21:39, Reply)
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 21:39, Reply)
That is quite appallingly-written
And yet they define it later in the article; "half an angstrom (about half the size of an atom)".
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:04, Reply)
And yet they define it later in the article; "half an angstrom (about half the size of an atom)".
( , Thu 1 May 2014, 22:04, Reply)