
So it's time to vote for the 17th Shed of the year
Some crackers this year (when is there not after all this time)
I have managed to get the finalists down from 209 inventive entries to just 26 sheds
( , Tue 13 Jun 2023, 13:34, Reply)

I voted on all the ones that didn't offend me with tasteless/ostentatiousness, basically the three that look like they might be useful sheds and not a personality substitute or rich bastard's cunty bragging project.
The 'most colourful' category seems redundant, as that's not a matter of opinion, so one should simply count the colours and declare a winner.
( , Tue 13 Jun 2023, 20:00, Reply)

Any entrant who didn't do most of the work themselves should be locked in their shed for life, though.
( , Wed 14 Jun 2023, 8:33, Reply)

Poor people don't have "summer houses" or fancy interior design in their sheds. Poor people can't afford sheds.
( , Wed 14 Jun 2023, 14:30, Reply)

Some of the ones I like the most are marked up as less than £100
If they paid for a designer, then CHEATS but there's a big gap between being in poverty and being rich beyond your wildest dreams.
(Which isn't to say that some entrants don't look pretty well off)
( , Wed 14 Jun 2023, 15:23, Reply)

Not one of them is poor.
( , Fri 16 Jun 2023, 15:49, Reply)

Introducing the new elimination process in which losing sheds are torched, bulldozed or exploded in front of their creators. Building week by week with early elimination rounds the contest concludes with a grand multipart demolition voted for by the public.
( , Wed 14 Jun 2023, 7:38, Reply)

The winner is the one with the most undiscovered corpses.
( , Wed 14 Jun 2023, 16:09, Reply)