data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Willenium tugs our sleeve and says: Tell us why the past was a bit shit. You may wish to use witty anecdotes reflecting your own personal experience.
( , Thu 29 Aug 2013, 13:06)
« Go Back
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
Cargo pants! Loads of pockets! Where are the ones for us girlies?
( , Sat 31 Aug 2013, 14:49, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
Some of them, I am sure, were designed for women.
As to the OP I happen to think that trousers which fit and don't hang down below one's arsehole are preferable to the modern fetishh for ill-fitting garments.
( , Sat 31 Aug 2013, 15:14, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
and not as practical as the blokes' versions.
( , Sat 31 Aug 2013, 17:07, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
the women's ones do all seem to be more for fashion than practicality.
( , Sun 1 Sep 2013, 17:32, closed)
« Go Back