Bizarre leaps of logic
Amorous Badger says: "I once humorously suggested that someone had been internet-stalking a Big Brother contestant. They concluded that I was threatening them. What's the oddest misunderstanding you've been involved in?"
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 13:48)
Amorous Badger says: "I once humorously suggested that someone had been internet-stalking a Big Brother contestant. They concluded that I was threatening them. What's the oddest misunderstanding you've been involved in?"
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 13:48)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
cheers for that
for some reason I thought the dead sea scrolls were all in Aramaic and represented the earliest known bible - I went back to check, turns out some of them were documents in Aramaic but the bible copy and most of the other items were in Hebrew
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 20:14, 1 reply)
for some reason I thought the dead sea scrolls were all in Aramaic and represented the earliest known bible - I went back to check, turns out some of them were documents in Aramaic but the bible copy and most of the other items were in Hebrew
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 20:14, 1 reply)
apparently yes
the bible found among the dead sea scrolls is the oldest Hebrew language version of the bible ever discovered
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 20:28, closed)
the bible found among the dead sea scrolls is the oldest Hebrew language version of the bible ever discovered
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 20:28, closed)
there are what are thought to be quotes from the book of Numbers in paleo-Hebrew script
dating from late pre-exilic times (about 600 BC) on a pair of tiny silver scrolls.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketef_Hinnom
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:15, closed)
dating from late pre-exilic times (about 600 BC) on a pair of tiny silver scrolls.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketef_Hinnom
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:15, closed)
just spent fascinating 40-odd minutes reading about paleography. cheers for the spur to learn something
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 22:01, closed)
the official version the Jews use is in Hebrew as well,
called the Masoretic text and dates back to at least 10th century. It was a dead as a spoken language but still kept on in textual form.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:12, closed)
called the Masoretic text and dates back to at least 10th century. It was a dead as a spoken language but still kept on in textual form.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:12, closed)
That most Jewish people at that time did not comprehend as text. Making it very dead?
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:46, closed)
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:46, closed)
yes it's dead,
but that doesn't mean it isn't used as the basis for translations. It reads a bit like Shakespearean English to Modern Hebrew speakers, I think.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:50, closed)
but that doesn't mean it isn't used as the basis for translations. It reads a bit like Shakespearean English to Modern Hebrew speakers, I think.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:50, closed)
You may have missed my earlier remarks regarding Hebrew and I have just realised I am
way out of my league. I am going to watch re-runs of 3-2-1.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:53, closed)
way out of my league. I am going to watch re-runs of 3-2-1.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 21:53, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread