Ignorance
I once was in a programming class where the task was "build a calculator". A student did one with buttons 1, 2, 3 all the way up to about 25 and then ran out of space on the screen. We've asked this before but liked it so much we're asking again: What's the best example of ignorance you've encountered?
( , Thu 30 Aug 2012, 12:30)
I once was in a programming class where the task was "build a calculator". A student did one with buttons 1, 2, 3 all the way up to about 25 and then ran out of space on the screen. We've asked this before but liked it so much we're asking again: What's the best example of ignorance you've encountered?
( , Thu 30 Aug 2012, 12:30)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Yes, it does. That's how nouns work. Stones for instance are called stones, because we call them stones.
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 11:16, 1 reply)
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 11:16, 1 reply)
No it doesn't. We could call an apple a stone but it would still be an apple.
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 12:02, closed)
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 12:02, closed)
No, if everyone started calling an apple a stone, after a while the definition would be added to dictionarys.
Give it a couple centuries, and you'd have to look in a historical thesaurus to find out that stones used to be called apples.
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 12:14, closed)
Give it a couple centuries, and you'd have to look in a historical thesaurus to find out that stones used to be called apples.
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 12:14, closed)
You lot need to read some Wittgenstein
That'll clear it up.
plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein/#Lan
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 23:09, closed)
That'll clear it up.
plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein/#Lan
( , Sun 2 Sep 2012, 23:09, closed)
I was thinking more Kripke and Putnam.
And then they could perhaps come back and explain Naming and Necessity, because I've never managed to get through it.
( , Mon 3 Sep 2012, 14:16, closed)
And then they could perhaps come back and explain Naming and Necessity, because I've never managed to get through it.
( , Mon 3 Sep 2012, 14:16, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread