This book changed my life
The Goat writes, "Some books have made a huge impact on my life." It's true. It wasn't until the b3ta mods read the Flashman novels that we changed from mild-mannered computer operators into heavily-whiskered copulators, poltroons and all round bastards in a well-known cavalry regiment.
What books have changed the way you think, the way you live, or just gave you a rollicking good time?
Friendly hint: A bit of background rather than just a bunch of book titles would make your stories more readable
( , Thu 15 May 2008, 15:11)
The Goat writes, "Some books have made a huge impact on my life." It's true. It wasn't until the b3ta mods read the Flashman novels that we changed from mild-mannered computer operators into heavily-whiskered copulators, poltroons and all round bastards in a well-known cavalry regiment.
What books have changed the way you think, the way you live, or just gave you a rollicking good time?
Friendly hint: A bit of background rather than just a bunch of book titles would make your stories more readable
( , Thu 15 May 2008, 15:11)
« Go Back
I'm suddenly remembering a game David Lodge invented
(or at least described - see Changing Places). It was called 'Humiliation': the idea was that each person comes up with a book that they haven't read, and scores points for each other player that *has* read it. So the idea is to bring up books that you really should have read but haven't. He describes it as a particularly English game - Americans who tried to play it invariably kept suggesting very obscure books.
I'd do well among literary types - I can never get through pre-20th century literature and have never managed to read Austen, Dickens or any of the Brontes. I'd do very badly if we played it on B3ta - it turns out I agree with nearly all of you!
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 13:58, 7 replies)
(or at least described - see Changing Places). It was called 'Humiliation': the idea was that each person comes up with a book that they haven't read, and scores points for each other player that *has* read it. So the idea is to bring up books that you really should have read but haven't. He describes it as a particularly English game - Americans who tried to play it invariably kept suggesting very obscure books.
I'd do well among literary types - I can never get through pre-20th century literature and have never managed to read Austen, Dickens or any of the Brontes. I'd do very badly if we played it on B3ta - it turns out I agree with nearly all of you!
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 13:58, 7 replies)
Is that because
the Americans had read everything but the most obscure books?
Or were they just not really understanding that the scatter-gun approach was not the best way to win here?
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:17, closed)
the Americans had read everything but the most obscure books?
Or were they just not really understanding that the scatter-gun approach was not the best way to win here?
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:17, closed)
@Thinker -
I don't think that's it: I think it's that Brits tend to have a more relaxed attitude to things they ought to have done but haven't. An American, the idea is, wouldn't want publicly to admit not being familiar with something in the canon, so would only name something obscure and non-canonical. A Brit would have a different attitude.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:35, closed)
I don't think that's it: I think it's that Brits tend to have a more relaxed attitude to things they ought to have done but haven't. An American, the idea is, wouldn't want publicly to admit not being familiar with something in the canon, so would only name something obscure and non-canonical. A Brit would have a different attitude.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:35, closed)
I've read that David Lodge trilogy
- as any self-respecting academic should. Does that gain or lose me points?
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:40, closed)
- as any self-respecting academic should. Does that gain or lose me points?
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:40, closed)
@CHCB
I haven't. Therefore I win points at your expense.
(Then again, you seem to have read everything, which means you'd get a very low score by default. Ha!)
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:44, closed)
I haven't. Therefore I win points at your expense.
(Then again, you seem to have read everything, which means you'd get a very low score by default. Ha!)
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:44, closed)
Shame on you, Dr E
I thought you were a self-respecting academic. I'll lend it to you.
Yeah, I have read everything, pretty much. Except The Mill on the Floss and the second half of Ulysses.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:50, closed)
I thought you were a self-respecting academic. I'll lend it to you.
Yeah, I have read everything, pretty much. Except The Mill on the Floss and the second half of Ulysses.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:50, closed)
Ach...
You get half a point for Ulysses, then. I've read it all.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:51, closed)
You get half a point for Ulysses, then. I've read it all.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 14:51, closed)
I get a point for your Mill on the Floss
And I even bought myself another copy of it a couple of weeks ago to re-read it because I detested it the first time - I want to see if it still annoys the hell out of me.
But you get my David Lodge points - I've got Small World and have read half of it.
And Enzyme gets my Ulysses points - I gave up after five pages.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 18:37, closed)
And I even bought myself another copy of it a couple of weeks ago to re-read it because I detested it the first time - I want to see if it still annoys the hell out of me.
But you get my David Lodge points - I've got Small World and have read half of it.
And Enzyme gets my Ulysses points - I gave up after five pages.
( , Mon 19 May 2008, 18:37, closed)
« Go Back