Yet said creator would have to be a supernatural entity
Or at least outside the bounds of nature as we know it. Whether you worship a god or not, believing in one places you firmly back in the religious camp. Besides, it was you who posted the "men in white coats/men in black dresses" stuff, and from what you've posted, you're definitely not on the side of the scientists.
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 16:14, 2 replies)

You still appear to be confusing theism
with religion.

The two are quite different, I assure you. It is possible to be a theist without being religious, and, indeed, one can be a creationist without being a Creationist.

I am neither, have never expressed allegiance to either, and I don't know why on earth you think I am more inclined to one or the other.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 16:18, closed)

Religion and theism are pretty close
"Religion is a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of life and the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a supernatural agency, or human beings’ relation to that which they regard as holy, sacred, spiritual, or divine."

"Theism, in the broadest sense, is the belief that at least one deity exists. In a more specific sense, theism refers to a doctrine concerning the nature of a monotheistic God and God's relationship to the universe."

You might be thinking of "deism".
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 21:59, closed)

not necessarily

( sandettie light vessel automatic New Twitter - @bollocksreally, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 17:39, closed)

Yes, necessarily.
In order to create the universe, a creator would have to exist outside said universe, violating the "natural" laws of this universe, hence supernatural.
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Tue 18 Jan 2011, 22:02, closed)