What nonsense did you believe in as a kid?
Ever thought that you could get flushed down the loo? That girls wee out their bottoms? Or that bumming means two men rubbing their bums together? Tell us about your childhood misconceptions. Thanks to Joefish for the suggestion.
( , Wed 18 Jan 2012, 15:21)
Ever thought that you could get flushed down the loo? That girls wee out their bottoms? Or that bumming means two men rubbing their bums together? Tell us about your childhood misconceptions. Thanks to Joefish for the suggestion.
( , Wed 18 Jan 2012, 15:21)
« Go Back
Plurals
I used to think that Alien and Aliens were the same film. With a logic based on how some people say Tescos instead of Tesco.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:35, 31 replies)
I used to think that Alien and Aliens were the same film. With a logic based on how some people say Tescos instead of Tesco.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:35, 31 replies)
And merkins say Legos instead of Lego
Merkinisms don't usually bother me, but that one drives me nuts.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:40, closed)
Merkinisms don't usually bother me, but that one drives me nuts.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:40, closed)
So Lego is Legos,
and Maths is Math.
Imbecile. (by which I of course mean ImbecileS)
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:46, closed)
and Maths is Math.
Imbecile. (by which I of course mean ImbecileS)
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:46, closed)
People who talk differently to me are fucking stupid,
because I'm so fucking perfect.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:53, closed)
because I'm so fucking perfect.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:53, closed)
THIS WEEK
SCARPE IS ANGRY.
AS ANGRY AS A HAMSTER WHOSE ELDEST SON HAS JUST BEEN SOLD TO FREDDIE STARR.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 16:01, closed)
SCARPE IS ANGRY.
AS ANGRY AS A HAMSTER WHOSE ELDEST SON HAS JUST BEEN SOLD TO FREDDIE STARR.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 16:01, closed)
Hahahah.
I'm not, I promise.
For some reason it just really bugs me that it's OK to generalise and abuse Americans in a way that it is not for almost any other group of people I can think of. Except maybe The French.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 16:08, closed)
I'm not, I promise.
For some reason it just really bugs me that it's OK to generalise and abuse Americans in a way that it is not for almost any other group of people I can think of. Except maybe The French.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 16:08, closed)
I don't mind this, as it's certainly less of a mouthful than
Lego pieces, or pieces of Lego.
Still, "bricks" is much easier.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:53, closed)
Lego pieces, or pieces of Lego.
Still, "bricks" is much easier.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 13:53, closed)
It just wouldn't make a very good rule
you wouldn't say 'Meccanos' or 'Scalextricses'
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:19, closed)
you wouldn't say 'Meccanos' or 'Scalextricses'
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:19, closed)
I was intrigued, so I looked it up:
"Which is correct as the plural of LEGO: 'Lego' or 'Legos'? Neither, actually. The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces' or whatever (using LEGO as an adjective -- and one should really capitalize all of the letters, and put the little 'circle-R' symbol after it (®)). This is all a matter of protecting the trademark of 'LEGO' for the company (using it otherwise degenerates the strength of the trademark). This is not to say that I use the word correctly 100% of the time... but that's the answer to the question (it's always fun/painful to read the near-flame-wars that start at slashdot.org over this topic... and generally, both sides are wrong). "
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:21, closed)
"Which is correct as the plural of LEGO: 'Lego' or 'Legos'? Neither, actually. The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces' or whatever (using LEGO as an adjective -- and one should really capitalize all of the letters, and put the little 'circle-R' symbol after it (®)). This is all a matter of protecting the trademark of 'LEGO' for the company (using it otherwise degenerates the strength of the trademark). This is not to say that I use the word correctly 100% of the time... but that's the answer to the question (it's always fun/painful to read the near-flame-wars that start at slashdot.org over this topic... and generally, both sides are wrong). "
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:21, closed)
Although:
painintheenglish.com/case/4639
It's possible that I am thinking about this too much.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:27, closed)
painintheenglish.com/case/4639
It's possible that I am thinking about this too much.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:27, closed)
It is worth noting
that the rivals to Lego produce bricks with far worse tolerances and it takes some effort to make something that fastens together as perfectly as Lego does.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:38, closed)
that the rivals to Lego produce bricks with far worse tolerances and it takes some effort to make something that fastens together as perfectly as Lego does.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:38, closed)
Not necessarily so
I bought a load of cheap-arsed bootLego recently and "Click-Brick" pieces are practically indistinguishable from the genuine article. Other manufacturers, your mileage may vary, but this stuff is as good as the real thing:
uk.ebid.net/for-sale/click-brick-inter-locking-plastic-building-brick-construction-set-bn-56798369.htm
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:11, closed)
I bought a load of cheap-arsed bootLego recently and "Click-Brick" pieces are practically indistinguishable from the genuine article. Other manufacturers, your mileage may vary, but this stuff is as good as the real thing:
uk.ebid.net/for-sale/click-brick-inter-locking-plastic-building-brick-construction-set-bn-56798369.htm
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:11, closed)
I saw this on telly once
Proper engineering goes on in the manufacture of these.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:12, closed)
Proper engineering goes on in the manufacture of these.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:12, closed)
'Every piece of LEGO ever made will fit with every other piece of LEGO ever made'
Although I am not sure that holds up in these days of specifically designed Harry Potter LEGO and the like, but should still be true of the general play sets.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:15, closed)
Although I am not sure that holds up in these days of specifically designed Harry Potter LEGO and the like, but should still be true of the general play sets.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:15, closed)
So, "bricks" it is, then.
Then again, "pieces" is probably more accurate.
Have to agree with slva, though: Lego really do produce a superior product to those of their competitors.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:50, closed)
Then again, "pieces" is probably more accurate.
Have to agree with slva, though: Lego really do produce a superior product to those of their competitors.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:50, closed)
Having spent Boxing Day playing with the stuff, I can only concur.
Although I did learn that my knees are no longer able to withstand two solid hours of kneeling on the carpet the way they used to be.
/something about my sex life.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:57, closed)
Although I did learn that my knees are no longer able to withstand two solid hours of kneeling on the carpet the way they used to be.
/something about my sex life.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 14:57, closed)
All my joints failed at the weekend,
whilst sprawled out on my sons' floor, as he barked his lego-building instructions at me.
On the plus side, we built a veritable army of small ducks, some of whom were smoking pipes.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:42, closed)
whilst sprawled out on my sons' floor, as he barked his lego-building instructions at me.
On the plus side, we built a veritable army of small ducks, some of whom were smoking pipes.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:42, closed)
Nah.
There's no reason why you can't use an adjective in place of a noun when the noun is strongly implied. For example:
"Wendy cooked a delicious roast"
"It's easy to blame the poor"
"I'm playing with my Lego"
See?
Edit: Lego is awesome.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:00, closed)
There's no reason why you can't use an adjective in place of a noun when the noun is strongly implied. For example:
"Wendy cooked a delicious roast"
"It's easy to blame the poor"
"I'm playing with my Lego"
See?
Edit: Lego is awesome.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:00, closed)
Fuck - I just disproved my own point
Because: "Wendy cooked six delicious roast dinners" would become "Wendy cooked six delicious roasts".
Although... "It's easy to blame a poor person" vs. "It's easy to blame poor people"... Help me internet, I confus'ed myself.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:05, closed)
Because: "Wendy cooked six delicious roast dinners" would become "Wendy cooked six delicious roasts".
Although... "It's easy to blame a poor person" vs. "It's easy to blame poor people"... Help me internet, I confus'ed myself.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:05, closed)
Maybe it's just an arbitrary point that only idiots care about.
Maybe.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:06, closed)
Maybe.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:06, closed)
I get more worked up by Paul Hollywood,
describing someone's biscuit as "a good bake." partly because I'm not convinced that "a good bake" is particularly meaningful, and partly because I think that Paul Hollywood is a bit of a wally.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:45, closed)
describing someone's biscuit as "a good bake." partly because I'm not convinced that "a good bake" is particularly meaningful, and partly because I think that Paul Hollywood is a bit of a wally.
( , Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:45, closed)
« Go Back