I don't understand the attraction
Smaug says: Ricky Gervais. Lesbian pr0n. Going into a crowded bar, purely because it's crowded. All these things seem to be popular with everybody else, but I just can't work out why. What leaves you cold just as much as it turns everyone else on?
( , Thu 15 Oct 2009, 14:54)
Smaug says: Ricky Gervais. Lesbian pr0n. Going into a crowded bar, purely because it's crowded. All these things seem to be popular with everybody else, but I just can't work out why. What leaves you cold just as much as it turns everyone else on?
( , Thu 15 Oct 2009, 14:54)
« Go Back
Attitudes Towards Science
Yes I know most of you will scroll pass at the very mention of science so for those geeky or foolish enough to still be reading I'll keep it short.
All scienctific discovery is either treated as "hocus pocus, mad scientist bullshit that doesn't have any purpose so why do they even bother?" or strangely paradoxical trust/despise stories on health issues (see the supposed MMR scandal and more recently everyone running to blame scientists over the death of a girl riddled with cancer because she had the cervical cancer jab that day). All I want is for more people to have a basic understanding of what the scientific process of peer review involves and for the media to simply take a rusty bayonet to their throat.
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 10:46, 7 replies)
Yes I know most of you will scroll pass at the very mention of science so for those geeky or foolish enough to still be reading I'll keep it short.
All scienctific discovery is either treated as "hocus pocus, mad scientist bullshit that doesn't have any purpose so why do they even bother?" or strangely paradoxical trust/despise stories on health issues (see the supposed MMR scandal and more recently everyone running to blame scientists over the death of a girl riddled with cancer because she had the cervical cancer jab that day). All I want is for more people to have a basic understanding of what the scientific process of peer review involves and for the media to simply take a rusty bayonet to their throat.
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 10:46, 7 replies)
Have you been directed to Ben Goldacre's
"Bad Science" before?
A man with similar sentiments to yourself about the public attitude to science. www.badscience.net - it's definitely worth a read although it might annoy you further when you read about similarly retarded reporting of all things scientific.
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 10:53, closed)
"Bad Science" before?
A man with similar sentiments to yourself about the public attitude to science. www.badscience.net - it's definitely worth a read although it might annoy you further when you read about similarly retarded reporting of all things scientific.
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 10:53, closed)
It is excellent, but...
I told my wife so many of the stories from it that she no longer wishes to read it.
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 13:54, closed)
I told my wife so many of the stories from it that she no longer wishes to read it.
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 13:54, closed)
I agree..
but I also think some scientists can present work in a over complicated way making people not understand it and therefore think it hocus pocus. As scientists we are responsible to making it understandable and show people, simply, the relevance to them
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 12:33, closed)
but I also think some scientists can present work in a over complicated way making people not understand it and therefore think it hocus pocus. As scientists we are responsible to making it understandable and show people, simply, the relevance to them
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 12:33, closed)
funny that
the papers didn't report how the several thousand other girls who have had that jab are all fine
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 14:18, closed)
the papers didn't report how the several thousand other girls who have had that jab are all fine
( , Fri 16 Oct 2009, 14:18, closed)
« Go Back