![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Some mugs still think the MMR injection gives children autism (it doesn't), while others are of the belief that we're ruled by billionaire lizard people. Tell us about views outside the mainstream which people go glassy eyed if you bang on about them (Your grandad's a racist - no need to tell us, thanks)
Suggested by Frample Thromwibbler
( , Thu 25 Apr 2013, 12:06)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
was not preventing the formation of the state of Israel in 1947-8. I understand why we didn't - some felt guilty at failing to prevent the holocaust, and worried how preventing a homeland for its survivors would appear. Others simply wanted to get more Jews out of Europe and didnt care where they went.
But whatever the average motivation for standing back and allowing it to happen, it's poisoned all of subsequent middle-eastern history
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 18:12, 16 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'%C3%A9tat
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 18:24, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
if you ignore the entire history of European involvement in the middle east and instead blame it all on the dirty Jews like some sort of witless tweenage fuck end.
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 18:45, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
To summarise, in plain terms, Britain and France both agreed to let the Middle East rot during WW1. If you think WW1 was all about Northern Europe - look it up.
The Balfour Declaration laid down the framework for an independent democratic state - effectively what you are objecting against was legitimised in 1918.
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 19:06, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'm oversimplifying I know - it seemed in-tune with the theme of the QOTW. Cause and effect in that region can be strung out convincingly back to the days of Salah bin ul-Aydin via the Ottoman empire but Balfour must share a big chunk of the blame.
Could also argue - perhaps less controversially although not by much - that the Ottoman Turks had the best record of the past few centuries..
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 19:24, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
In the end 1948 was a big chance to say 'no more' that wasn't taken. 1948's when conspiracy became action on a major scale. 1948 was a disaster, the human displacement forcibly effected to make possible the recreation of a historic state was principally done then.
It equivalates the point nowadays where official U.N disapproval would probably switch to passing resolutions permitting action.
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 19:32, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
There was an assumption that the allies had convenientially resolved a problem and there was a rather greater concentration upon the re-industrialisation of Western Europe.
I think the priorities were right.
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 19:40, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
He was very careful to ensure that it was always referred to in British terms of reference, and Balfour was an egotist quite prepared to let this happen.
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 19:33, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
can be strung out convincingly back to the formation of the first city-state Uruk in the early 4th millennium B.C.
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 19:55, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Pretty sure he could just manifest in a burning bush and settle the issue, once and for all, were he so inclined.
( , Fri 26 Apr 2013, 20:13, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Pretty sure he could just burn his bush and settle the issue.
( , Sat 27 Apr 2013, 12:57, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
"bum his bush", and slightly struggled to work it out....
( , Sun 28 Apr 2013, 13:29, closed)
« Go Back