Creepy!
Smash Monkey asks: "what's the creepiest thing you've seen, heard or felt? What has sent shivers running up your spine and skidmarks running up your undercrackers? Tell us, we'll make it all better"
( , Thu 7 Apr 2011, 13:57)
Smash Monkey asks: "what's the creepiest thing you've seen, heard or felt? What has sent shivers running up your spine and skidmarks running up your undercrackers? Tell us, we'll make it all better"
( , Thu 7 Apr 2011, 13:57)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
If memory serves, the Czech Republic has been the only country to date that's openly confirmed its use of number stations in espionage, though that was only after their stations had been decomissioned.
And without the code, the message is completely meaningless - which is probably why the senders are not bothered about sending unencrypted transmissions that can be picked up by anyone in range. For all we know, the number of repetitions might be part of the code itself.
As a method of relaying information, number stations have a lot going for them. They can easily be broadcast from anonymous locations like industrial estates, they use analogue technology so they can't be electronically traced (unlike anything on the internet), and, notwithstanding the efforts of radio enthusiasts, they're hard to detect if you're not looking for them.
( , Fri 8 Apr 2011, 2:39, 1 reply)
And without the code, the message is completely meaningless - which is probably why the senders are not bothered about sending unencrypted transmissions that can be picked up by anyone in range. For all we know, the number of repetitions might be part of the code itself.
As a method of relaying information, number stations have a lot going for them. They can easily be broadcast from anonymous locations like industrial estates, they use analogue technology so they can't be electronically traced (unlike anything on the internet), and, notwithstanding the efforts of radio enthusiasts, they're hard to detect if you're not looking for them.
( , Fri 8 Apr 2011, 2:39, 1 reply)
More importantly
They need nothing more complex than a shortwave radio to receive. Whilst it's probably fairly unusual to see a shortwave radio in somebody's luggage these days, prior to t'internets it was perfectly non-incriminating.
( , Sat 9 Apr 2011, 12:05, closed)
They need nothing more complex than a shortwave radio to receive. Whilst it's probably fairly unusual to see a shortwave radio in somebody's luggage these days, prior to t'internets it was perfectly non-incriminating.
( , Sat 9 Apr 2011, 12:05, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread