I can't find any flaws
in any of the zero references you provided.
(apeloverage committed the vile act of onanism on, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 14:07, 3 replies)

He isn't helped by looking and sounding and acting like a creepy rapist
I'm sure the jury will look kindly on Julian though
( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 14:12, closed)

The court transcripts are freely available. Google them.
His legal defence against extradition (or one of them) was that what he did, while it consitutes assault and rape in Sweden, it doesn't in the UK. This was shown to be demonstrably wrong at every level of UK legal process. It is very clearly rape to have sex with someone when they are not in a position to consent.

The purpose of questioning and a trial would be to decide if there is enough grounds to believe he thought he had prior consent (if he did, he's merely a fucking creepy cunt, becuase having sex with someone who isn't conscious is a pretty disturbing thing to do) or if he didn't have prior consent, in which case he's a rapist. It's pretty simple.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 14:40, closed)

"Google them" isn't a reference.

(apeloverage committed the vile act of onanism on, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 15:42, closed)

Right, and that's the flaw in the post?
well done. really.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 15:44, closed)

It's a flaw in the post
since the post was a defence against me pointing out you have no references.

"Google them" isn't a reference. It's not up to anyone else to find out whether there's information that supports what you're saying.

You have no references for what you're saying.
(apeloverage committed the vile act of onanism on, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:00, closed)

no, it was an instruction
Why the sweet fuck should I waste my precious time? You've provided no reference to your tinfoil hatted idiocy that he's at risk of extradition to the US, either.

In any case, my post wasn't to provide references to back up B_D, it was to provide more depth of information, to clarify the point. If you don't believe it, fine, suit yourself, but don't whine when your bollocks is shot down on here, eh?

Magistrates court

high court

supreme court
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:08, closed)

Ten steps ahead of me, as usual.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:11, closed)

This is the most piss weak argument I've ever seen.
You're just floundering now because you know that ten seconds on Google will prove you wrong.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 16:09, closed)

So you're saying my references are flawless?

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 14:41, closed)

I think he's flirting with you.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 14:43, closed)

Understandable, I'm very attractive.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 14:45, closed)

I would.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 21 Aug 2012, 15:16, closed)

Totally
wouldn't.
(Misery McUglywife an attention seeking sociopathic fuckstain., Tue 21 Aug 2012, 21:53, closed)