Things I've gone off
Spimf says: I've always enjoyed listening to Pink Floyd, but lately I've noticed if my iPod plays any of their tracks, I skip them. I'm starting to realise I've gone off them. What have you gone off lately?
( , Thu 15 Aug 2013, 12:15)
Spimf says: I've always enjoyed listening to Pink Floyd, but lately I've noticed if my iPod plays any of their tracks, I skip them. I'm starting to realise I've gone off them. What have you gone off lately?
( , Thu 15 Aug 2013, 12:15)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Interesting. You think ignore
2.0 is what causes the lack of content on QOTW now?
I haven't got anyone on ignore, and as far as I can see, only Shambo got upset enough to put me on ignore.
It's simpler. Compared to a year ago this place is a smoking wreck. The trolling little kids, and snarky cunts like you who have made sure it's just not worthwhile posting anything.
It's kind of hypocritical of me to say this, because nowadays 90% of what I post is shit flinging, but then I didn't start it, I'm just going with the flow.
Less and less each day, of course. You guys aren't anywhere near as entertaining as you think you are.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:10, 3 replies)
2.0 is what causes the lack of content on QOTW now?
I haven't got anyone on ignore, and as far as I can see, only Shambo got upset enough to put me on ignore.
It's simpler. Compared to a year ago this place is a smoking wreck. The trolling little kids, and snarky cunts like you who have made sure it's just not worthwhile posting anything.
It's kind of hypocritical of me to say this, because nowadays 90% of what I post is shit flinging, but then I didn't start it, I'm just going with the flow.
Less and less each day, of course. You guys aren't anywhere near as entertaining as you think you are.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:10, 3 replies)
yeah ok,
but i think edjogs' point
is that having ignore 2.0
affects users who don't use it
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:14, closed)
but i think edjogs' point
is that having ignore 2.0
affects users who don't use it
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:14, closed)
Yes,
I understood that, and it was always pretty obvious anyway.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:22, closed)
I understood that, and it was always pretty obvious anyway.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:22, closed)
you didn't seem
to have understood that
based on the content
of your post
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:26, closed)
to have understood that
based on the content
of your post
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:26, closed)
Well, I did.
I understood that about 5 minutes after ignore 2.0 was launched, and it has been discussed already, a long time ago.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:38, closed)
I understood that about 5 minutes after ignore 2.0 was launched, and it has been discussed already, a long time ago.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:38, closed)
ok hun
just saying that
it didn't seem like
you understood
no offence
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:40, closed)
just saying that
it didn't seem like
you understood
no offence
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:40, closed)
Hello username.
Please note that I have not said that ignore2 causes lack of content, just biased content.
I am also surprised that you refer to me as a S.C.. I'd like to know what, in my post, gave you that impression.
From my criticism of the workings of one small part of the site you seem to have extrapolated that I am responsible for what you are calling the site's deterioration to a point where it's not worth posting. Obviously I disagree with your premise because I am still posting, as I note, are you.
Sorry for any offence caused.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:31, closed)
Please note that I have not said that ignore2 causes lack of content, just biased content.
I am also surprised that you refer to me as a S.C.. I'd like to know what, in my post, gave you that impression.
From my criticism of the workings of one small part of the site you seem to have extrapolated that I am responsible for what you are calling the site's deterioration to a point where it's not worth posting. Obviously I disagree with your premise because I am still posting, as I note, are you.
Sorry for any offence caused.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:31, closed)
Attaboy Monty
We need your brand of fiery wit in this thread.
Well done.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:42, closed)
We need your brand of fiery wit in this thread.
Well done.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:42, closed)
No it wasn't that post,
in particular, it's that in general you are a snarky cunt. This is another example of your passive aggressive 'what? Me?' style of posting.
Take a cue from that Doveston guy - if you're going to post charmless trying-to-be-clever non answers to everything, at least keep it short.
Thanks.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:41, closed)
in particular, it's that in general you are a snarky cunt. This is another example of your passive aggressive 'what? Me?' style of posting.
Take a cue from that Doveston guy - if you're going to post charmless trying-to-be-clever non answers to everything, at least keep it short.
Thanks.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:41, closed)
edj here is a perfectly reasonable and mild-mannered poster.
I appreciate that you might not get along with some of my posts but you're losing your fucking mind here mate, it's getting embarrassing.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:55, closed)
I appreciate that you might not get along with some of my posts but you're losing your fucking mind here mate, it's getting embarrassing.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 17:55, closed)
Maybe categorising everything you disagree with as
snarky, charmless, trying to be clever, trolling little kids, passive aggressive, what me? ,, and that's just in this thread, gets in the way of assessing what I've actually written. Just a thought, or it may be my inability to express myself. If so I'll try harder.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 18:46, closed)
snarky, charmless, trying to be clever, trolling little kids, passive aggressive, what me? ,, and that's just in this thread, gets in the way of assessing what I've actually written. Just a thought, or it may be my inability to express myself. If so I'll try harder.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 18:46, closed)
OK, well I might be wrong
but you were having a pop the other day, so I just lumped you in with the puppy squad.
I'm being a twat with pretty much everyone at the moment, so don't take it personally.
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 8:33, closed)
but you were having a pop the other day, so I just lumped you in with the puppy squad.
I'm being a twat with pretty much everyone at the moment, so don't take it personally.
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 8:33, closed)
fewer people would have a pop at you if you stopped being such a tedious, self-pitying emoprick.
/top tip
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 10:36, closed)
/top tip
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 10:36, closed)
Thanks you sanctimonious cuntbubble.
As you're one of the most prolific purveyors of mindless drivel in this place, I'll pass on your advice.
Why not do something useful, like fuck yourself with a chainsaw? Just a suggestion, ya know?
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 12:24, closed)
As you're one of the most prolific purveyors of mindless drivel in this place, I'll pass on your advice.
Why not do something useful, like fuck yourself with a chainsaw? Just a suggestion, ya know?
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 12:24, closed)
with his relentless bigotry and self-importance,
and his tendency to moralise and make dismal speeches at the drop of a hat, I reckon he'd make a brilliant Tory MP
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 22:05, closed)
and his tendency to moralise and make dismal speeches at the drop of a hat, I reckon he'd make a brilliant Tory MP
( , Wed 21 Aug 2013, 22:05, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread