Irrational Hatred
People who say "less" when they mean "fewer" ought to be turned into soup, the soup fed to baboons and the baboons fired into an active volcano. What has you grinding your teeth with rage, and why?
Suggested by Smash Monkey
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 14:36)
People who say "less" when they mean "fewer" ought to be turned into soup, the soup fed to baboons and the baboons fired into an active volcano. What has you grinding your teeth with rage, and why?
Suggested by Smash Monkey
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 14:36)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
NEVER be a grammar Nazi
on the internet, as it always comes back and bites you on the arse
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 17:19, 1 reply)
on the internet, as it always comes back and bites you on the arse
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 17:19, 1 reply)
Fair point well made.
I was just trying to be clever.
And temporarily succeeding, if I do say so myself.
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 17:31, closed)
I was just trying to be clever.
And temporarily succeeding, if I do say so myself.
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 17:31, closed)
Nope. It was deliberate.
There's a difference between knowing the rules so that you can bend them for effect, and just not knowing the rules.
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 18:07, closed)
There's a difference between knowing the rules so that you can bend them for effect, and just not knowing the rules.
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 18:07, closed)
I remember you!
You're the guy who got bullied and spat on at school.
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 19:30, closed)
You're the guy who got bullied and spat on at school.
( , Thu 31 Mar 2011, 19:30, closed)
Yes
But remember what happens to people who bully me. They end up with a wrought iron fence up their arses. so, have a care!
( , Mon 4 Apr 2011, 13:06, closed)
But remember what happens to people who bully me. They end up with a wrought iron fence up their arses. so, have a care!
( , Mon 4 Apr 2011, 13:06, closed)
Don't follow you there...
... are you suggesting the OP intentionally missed the "'s" which (s)he has now corrected?
I agree that one can know the rules and bend them for effect but "that" rather than "that's" was evidently just a typo/rush job.
( , Fri 1 Apr 2011, 11:38, closed)
... are you suggesting the OP intentionally missed the "'s" which (s)he has now corrected?
I agree that one can know the rules and bend them for effect but "that" rather than "that's" was evidently just a typo/rush job.
( , Fri 1 Apr 2011, 11:38, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread