data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Either you love 'em or you hate 'em. Or in the case of Fred West - both. Tell us your ankle-biter stories.
( , Thu 17 Apr 2008, 15:10)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
"Nature is saying no for a reason." False. Nature's just a wanker like that.
"Different counties have different rules." They all have the same rules, currently govered by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Some counties are able to free up more spending, that's all.
"Disturbing and wrong." Wrong? So they're blameable for wanting a child? Were they as fertile as most, there'd be nothing you could do. And fertility problems are a medical problem, for which IVF is a (partial) solution. So - and I'm cutting a lot of argument out here - what you're essentially saying is that the infertile shouldn't have access to IVF because of the nature of their medical problem - ie their infertility. Odd.
"What kind of life will the child have". A perfectly good life, I'd wager. Why would it not?
( , Wed 23 Apr 2008, 12:07, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread