Letters they'll never read
"Apologies, anger, declarations of love, things you want to say to people, but can't or didn't get the chance to." Suggestion via reducedfatLOLcat.
( , Thu 4 Mar 2010, 13:56)
"Apologies, anger, declarations of love, things you want to say to people, but can't or didn't get the chance to." Suggestion via reducedfatLOLcat.
( , Thu 4 Mar 2010, 13:56)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Poorer than the Czechs?
Eh? UK GNI per capita is in the region of $45k; Czech GNI/capita is about $16k. That means that Brits are in the region of three times wealthier.
The size of a debt doesn't make you poor, because the borrowed money buys assets. For example, you aren't poor because you have a £100k mortgage - in fact, that makes you quite wealthy. If you can't make the payments and the debt becomes un-repayable, that's a problem: but merely having a debt isn't.
That governments borrow is no big deal. Most do. To borrow at a given interest rate is, in effect, to buy a service. There's nothing obviously wrong with governments buying services.
It might be wise to reduce the debt, of course. But a recession is not the time to cut spending. And, as the UK comes out of recession, tax revenues will rise, and welfare spending will fall. This means that a significant part of the debt - up to half, on some estimates - will repay itself even if the government does nothing.
Something similar applies to the banks. They were expensive to buy, but cheap compared to their potential value. If the government holds on to them for a couple of years, they'll be hugely valuable assets that can then be sold back to the private sector at a vast profit. (Of course, the Tories'll be in control then, so they'll spunk the cash away on tax cuts rather than spending it... but that's for another rant.)
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 14:29, 4 replies)
Eh? UK GNI per capita is in the region of $45k; Czech GNI/capita is about $16k. That means that Brits are in the region of three times wealthier.
The size of a debt doesn't make you poor, because the borrowed money buys assets. For example, you aren't poor because you have a £100k mortgage - in fact, that makes you quite wealthy. If you can't make the payments and the debt becomes un-repayable, that's a problem: but merely having a debt isn't.
That governments borrow is no big deal. Most do. To borrow at a given interest rate is, in effect, to buy a service. There's nothing obviously wrong with governments buying services.
It might be wise to reduce the debt, of course. But a recession is not the time to cut spending. And, as the UK comes out of recession, tax revenues will rise, and welfare spending will fall. This means that a significant part of the debt - up to half, on some estimates - will repay itself even if the government does nothing.
Something similar applies to the banks. They were expensive to buy, but cheap compared to their potential value. If the government holds on to them for a couple of years, they'll be hugely valuable assets that can then be sold back to the private sector at a vast profit. (Of course, the Tories'll be in control then, so they'll spunk the cash away on tax cuts rather than spending it... but that's for another rant.)
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 14:29, 4 replies)
Aye.
Just like what happened in Japan when they hit this point in the late 1980s.
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 15:31, closed)
Just like what happened in Japan when they hit this point in the late 1980s.
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 15:31, closed)
Ahem.
Party politics aside, the cunt brown sold the country's gold reserve for a knock-down price to allow the payment of £100 to each baby born, or some such marketing shit.
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 18:10, closed)
Party politics aside, the cunt brown sold the country's gold reserve for a knock-down price to allow the payment of £100 to each baby born, or some such marketing shit.
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 18:10, closed)
Oh, that crock again...
liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/24/why-tories-are-deluding-themselves-over-browns-gold-sell-off/
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 22:15, closed)
liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/24/why-tories-are-deluding-themselves-over-browns-gold-sell-off/
( , Tue 9 Mar 2010, 22:15, closed)
I dunno
An investor friend of mine, back in 1998, gave me the following piece of sage advice. "In a Labour first term, invest in property as they'll tax non-fixed assets and drive up house prices as people hedge. In a second term, invest in gold, because the asset bubble will make you rich."
Sadly, I didn't listen, because he now lives on the Cap d'Antibes and I don't.
( , Wed 10 Mar 2010, 10:51, closed)
An investor friend of mine, back in 1998, gave me the following piece of sage advice. "In a Labour first term, invest in property as they'll tax non-fixed assets and drive up house prices as people hedge. In a second term, invest in gold, because the asset bubble will make you rich."
Sadly, I didn't listen, because he now lives on the Cap d'Antibes and I don't.
( , Wed 10 Mar 2010, 10:51, closed)
This was written from the future, ten years in advance.
Perhaps that wasn't made clear.
Looking at the comments, I think my argument has been confirmed.
( , Thu 11 Mar 2010, 3:26, closed)
Perhaps that wasn't made clear.
Looking at the comments, I think my argument has been confirmed.
( , Thu 11 Mar 2010, 3:26, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread