Drugs
Tell us your pharmaceutically-influenced anecdotes, legal or otherwise. We promise not to dob you in to The Man.
Thanks to sanityclause for the suggestion
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 13:30)
Tell us your pharmaceutically-influenced anecdotes, legal or otherwise. We promise not to dob you in to The Man.
Thanks to sanityclause for the suggestion
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 13:30)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
If you don't like it
then don't bother coming over here. You don't see QOTWer's coming over to talk and shitting all over it, so why do you bother over here?
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:00, 2 replies)
then don't bother coming over here. You don't see QOTWer's coming over to talk and shitting all over it, so why do you bother over here?
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:00, 2 replies)
There needs to be an emoticon for
'no honestly, I'm being sincere'
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:02, closed)
'no honestly, I'm being sincere'
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:02, closed)
Ah, of course
The ever intelligent "I'm being sarcastic but if you ask me a question about being sarcastic I'll act like I wasn't being sarcastic" wit.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:05, closed)
The ever intelligent "I'm being sarcastic but if you ask me a question about being sarcastic I'll act like I wasn't being sarcastic" wit.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:05, closed)
That's only because as soon as one of the lying little shitcunts wanders into /talk, they immediately get destroyed in a gigantic ball of truth-filled flame.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:04, closed)
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:04, closed)
Careful now,
he's a lvl 100000000 sorcerer, we are but lvl 1 druids.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:09, closed)
he's a lvl 100000000 sorcerer, we are but lvl 1 druids.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:09, closed)
I could have sworn that Druid was actually a level 25 rape-eyes.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:19, closed)
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:19, closed)
You're not doing the man credit.
He's a level 97 monobrowed rape-eyes.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:39, closed)
He's a level 97 monobrowed rape-eyes.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:39, closed)
Where would we be without /talk?
A whole board of people defending online truth from behind false names.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:16, closed)
A whole board of people defending online truth from behind false names.
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:16, closed)
Evidently.
Don't tell the truth and apparently you get Destroyed (TM).
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:18, closed)
Don't tell the truth and apparently you get Destroyed (TM).
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 15:18, closed)
couldn't they blend in by creating a stupifyingly-dull thread about what they're having for tea, ending with a sickeningly faux-cute 'Nyom!'?
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 16:56, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread