Are you TRYING to prove that you know even less about the law than Frisbee-alan does?

( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Tue 6 Jan 2015, 20:12, 1 reply)

?

( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Tue 6 Jan 2015, 23:11, closed)

She's implying that the recent changes in the law will make that list of softcore magazines somehow illegal.
They won't.
The whole point about them BEING softcore means that none of the stuff that is now being declared illegal in the UK was ever IN those mags to begin with.
( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Wed 7 Jan 2015, 0:08, closed)

not quite
my thinking was that someone who loved porn so much would have moved on to harder stuff because the internet has made the mags obsolete and the range of stuff online would have expanded his interests which would now be denied blah blah blah blah.

but i'm not going to lie to you, i didn't exactly put much thought into that thinking. maybe he still goes to argos to lovingly steal the laminated pages of the shower screen section, who knows.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 7 Jan 2015, 10:40, closed)

Except the law only refers to producing it in the UK.
He could still get utter filth from anywhere else in the world and wank himself senseless.
( gone, Wed 7 Jan 2015, 11:18, closed)

which is probably what all the politicians do anyway

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 7 Jan 2015, 11:35, closed)

Yeah, right, because despite all evidence to the contrary, that's how the mind works.
You should try for a job writing articles for the Daily Mail. I'm not sure where you'd fit in best though, BAN ALL PORN articles for the "Out Of Our Minds" section, or, ALL GROWN UP, WEARING KILLER HEELS, REVEALING SWIMSUIT, LOOKS OLDER THAN HER YEARS blurb for the "Sidebar Of Shame".
( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Wed 7 Jan 2015, 16:04, closed)

they sound like the same article

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 7 Jan 2015, 17:10, closed)