b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » My Arch-nemesis » Post 715068 | Search
This is a question My Arch-nemesis

I lived in fear of a Darth Vader-esque school dinner lady who stood me perpetually at the naughty table for refusing to eat mushy peas. An ordeal made worse after I was caught spooning the accursed veg into her wellies. Who, we ask, has wrecked your life?

Thanks to Philly G for the suggestion

(, Thu 29 Apr 2010, 12:01)
Pages: Popular, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I think that's bollocks.
Every party has stuff that I disagree with, and have done stuff in the past that I shouldn't forgive, but I'd have to forgive their past and agree to the things I disagree with if I vote for them.
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 10:45, 2 replies)
Then you need to get over yourself and accept that parties change, priorities change, and there's only one way that you can change things
Or, y'know, you can just sit there and whine about how it's all so unfair and that you don't like it, but just don't be surprised when people don't take you seriously when you do so.
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 10:50, closed)
What? How is that even relievent to what I just said?
I shouldn't vote because I've not educated myself on the issue enough, I'm saying that I don't agree with any party on every issue, so would be voting for something I don't believe in.

Or is this one of those "Woooh, I'm so politicly aware, I'm voting so I can look down on people who don't" things?
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 10:58, closed)
No, I think this is one of those...
..."do something to try and make a difference, rather than act like an apathetic pedantic tosspot" kind of things.
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 11:00, closed)
Why is it down to me to 'make a difference' ?
Would you like to choose my vote for me? is that what you want? You can have it if you want.
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 11:01, closed)
Alrighty, fine. But..
...agree that abstaining from voting comes with the caveat that whatever happens over the next 4 years (that is politically influenced) is absolutely fine with you, irrespective of what actually occurs.
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 11:06, closed)
No one's asking you to agree with every party on every issue.
They're asking if you WANT - to assess them and vote for who you feel is best to do the job.

Wrap it up cynically if you like - "who do you think is the least bad?"

Either way, either do something to change the system (or not, if you like it how it is), or accept what you're given.

If you don't say what you want, don't complain about what you get. No one's telepathic.
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 11:07, closed)
What a load of old...
...bollocks.

Effectively you're restricting yourself to only ever voting for a party and a candidate which not only do you agree with 100%, but also which has never in the history of it's politics done anything which it now considers contrary to it's aims.

Never gonna happen. The point others are making is that if you don't bother to exercise the tiny bit of power you have over the future of the country, then you are being a tad hypocritical if you then moan about the state of said country. Bit like never tidying you're flat and then whinging that it's untidy.

Also, lack of knowledge of the policies and pledges of the major parties is not a valid reason to avoid voting - it's only once every 4 years: get off your fat arse and find out, work out which party - on balance - you believe to be best for the country (rather than just your pocket), and whatever happens over the next 4 years at least you'll know you did what you thought was best.
(, Thu 6 May 2010, 10:56, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Popular, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1