Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I thought that is a decent point.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:10, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
But I need some time to find out how true it is before I comment, because I've heard from other, equally biased, sources that Essex provides more than any other county in the South East.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:11, Reply)
does the board have a pet autism to do that?
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:12, Reply)
Edit - also, you BELIEVED a piece of information published in the Morning Star? Do you believe in what's printed in EDL pamphlets as well, it's about the same level of blinkeredness?
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:13, Reply)
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/34/part/6/chapter/5/crossheading/accommodation-needs-of-gypsies-and-travellers
If they didn't do that then they were breaking the law in the first place.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:16, Reply)
this row is about whether something was a permanent dwelling or a caravan. I'm not sure I see the relevance of that at all.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:22, Reply)
I believe is more justified if the land you're legally entitled to is not provided.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:25, Reply)
which is what the council is obliged to provide land for. Temporary caravans are not the problem here.
That doesn't make it any better that the council are failing to provide the land, but it doesn't justify their actions as it's a different issue.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:36, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread