They have frequently hinted that democracy would not be allowed under them.

(Glucose-Maximus All over the world., Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:01, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

But they have candidates in democratic elections.
Ergo they are at present a democratic party. They take part in the democratic system.

Please defend their policies.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:04, Reply)

If indeed they were democratic
I would say that even though every single policy of theirs I detest logically, emotionally, and rationally (as a right-liberal rather than a left authoritarian), they have a right to hold them and there would be nothing inherently evil about them, just wrong on a utilitarian level.
(Glucose-Maximus All over the world., Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:08, Reply)

I thought you said that a democratic party couldn't have any indefensible policies?

(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:09, Reply)

They are defensible, they just would not make me feel good about living in the UK.

(Glucose-Maximus All over the world., Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:11, Reply)

Go on then, defend the BNP's policies.

(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:12, Reply)

... Oh, Touche, I CBA.

(Glucose-Maximus All over the world., Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:14, Reply)

You mean you can't.
So you prove my point.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:16, Reply)

But this does not apply to the poll tax, hypothetically
if it were imposed in a nation with very high personal wealth.
There is not anything Inherently logistically or morally wrong with ALL flat taxes everywhere.
The Poll tax was wrong for the UK, does not mean that its imposition was devoid of good faith or reason, or that it could not work elsewhere.
(Glucose-Maximus All over the world., Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:21, Reply)

But Thatcher brought it in in the UK.
So what you are saying is a total irrelevance.

Learn to debate, you fool.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Mon 16 Jan 2012, 21:24, Reply)