No need to be quite so patronising.
In 1997, 182 seats changed hands, nearly 28% of the total. That's not dissmissable as middle england deciding the parliment, that's over a quarter of MP's being chucked out.
(PsychoChomp, Wed 25 Jan 2012, 15:54, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

It doesn't really work like that, though.
it requires a frightening small number of people to swing a close seat, so a very small number of people actually made a difference. You're right that there was a large swing in voters, but becuase of the system we use, the actual large swing in seats that made a difference was caused by a very small number of voters, relatively. I mean, you could probably work it out but I'd be astonished if the swing voters that changed seats added up to much more than half a million or so.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 25 Jan 2012, 16:00, Reply)

Surely every election can theoretically be won on one vote.

(PsychoChomp, Wed 25 Jan 2012, 16:08, Reply)

yes, but our system allows a government not wanted by the majority
to be placed in power by the actions of a minority.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 25 Jan 2012, 16:10, Reply)