
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

"less" can replace "fewer" but "fewer" can not replace "less". It's a modern, but acceptable usage.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:00, 1 reply, 13 years ago)

Fewer is discrete, less is continuous.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:01, Reply)

Kroney will start speaking in Old English soon.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:03, Reply)

If you have one person and cut their leg off, there's less person. That is how it works, no exceptions, fuck Kroney and his retard ways.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:05, Reply)

But this has been debated at great length on these pages several times.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:08, Reply)

What I'm not okay with is changing it to accommodate the stupid.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:08, Reply)

Using your example, it's something to do with a group of people being a crowd and so if you remove part of that crowd, there's less crowd left. Language drift, rather than lack of education.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:11, Reply)

Less crowd, fewer people composing said crowd. The crowd is a single thing, the people are not.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:13, Reply)

I'm just saying that the rules aren't as rigid as that anymore.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:16, Reply)

Grammar's a lost hope.
( , Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:18, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread