Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
"less" can replace "fewer" but "fewer" can not replace "less". It's a modern, but acceptable usage.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:00, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
Fewer is discrete, less is continuous.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:01, Reply)
Kroney will start speaking in Old English soon.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:03, Reply)
If you have one person and cut their leg off, there's less person. That is how it works, no exceptions, fuck Kroney and his retard ways.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:05, Reply)
But this has been debated at great length on these pages several times.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:08, Reply)
What I'm not okay with is changing it to accommodate the stupid.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:08, Reply)
Using your example, it's something to do with a group of people being a crowd and so if you remove part of that crowd, there's less crowd left. Language drift, rather than lack of education.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:11, Reply)
Less crowd, fewer people composing said crowd. The crowd is a single thing, the people are not.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:13, Reply)
I'm just saying that the rules aren't as rigid as that anymore.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:16, Reply)
Grammar's a lost hope.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:18, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread