My art teacher once ripped up my artwork and threw me out the classroom 'cus I was fucking around,
and I said to her "It's still art though, you shouldn't rip it up, its not what you told me to do, but isn't that the point of art?". A few days later she appologised to me. This was also the teacher who threw me out the class 'cus she asked the class "What is it called when you use your fingers to paint" and I put my hand up and said "fingering", and the class errupted in laughter but I didn't know why at the time.

Anyway, to the point, is one art more valueable than another? As an art commision, isn't undoing all his work (scribbling his name'n'shit) pretty much going against it's entire ethos? Ain't it all about getting people to talk about it?
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Thu 13 Dec 2012, 15:31, Reply)