Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I guess maybe I don't understand it, but what you described doesn't sound that hard.
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 21:31, 1 reply, 13 years ago)
But there are plenty of incredibly creative DJs doing very complicated things with time signatures and shit.
You fancy linkage?
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 21:34, Reply)
I'll stick to live stuff. I'm more impressed by a band using crazy time signatures, than a man who can hear them and mix them.
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 21:42, Reply)
how are they "conventionally joined"?
there's so much I could learn from this thread
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 21:59, Reply)
With a bit if skill 4-4 can blend to a 7-8, but it's hard work. Zappa loved doing bars of 8-8 for 3 then a 9-8 then back to 8-8 then 4-8 5-8 8-8
Timr signatures are fluid.
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:04, Reply)
It went all loop based.
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:10, Reply)
share your wisdom, teach me these secrets please
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:16, Reply)
1234567 1, 2, 3, 4
is when they're "conventionally joined" but
1234567 NIGNOG BANANA 1, 2, 3, 4
would be unconventional right? am I learning now? this is fun
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:18, Reply)
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:19, Reply)
must be complimentary time signatures
I understand now! thank you so much!
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:21, Reply)
and 4/8, isn't that the same thing in 2/4?
I don't know really, I'm just talking about things I don't fully understand, I might throw a long word in in a minute
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:15, Reply)
It's about the pulse of the music. It's more prominent in classical pieces, but it's to do with phrasing. You know this shit.
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:28, Reply)
I'm an idiot pretending to know about music by posting long words. I really only play kazoo.
(, Wed 6 Mar 2013, 22:23, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread