because that's the exact point we were discussing wasnt it?
that it's the badness of the owner rather than the breed? i'm so confused.
( Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:46, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

Yes and I am saying that even well trained dogs can attack
so the breeds most likely to kill if they did snap probably shouldn't be kept as pets. Ie. the big strong ones
( Peej, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:48, Reply)

i see what you mean
but also there is no evidence there that any of those dogs were not badly trained rather than well trained and just snapping

edit: though i should point out, if there were evidence of that then of course i would completely agree. i don't disagree even, i just havent seen any evidence other than what people reckon, so far here
( Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:49, Reply)

A large number of the deaths are children
So really the size of the dog is irrelevant.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:57, Reply)