Compared to, say, a CEO or footballer?
If wages relate to responsibility, then surely they ate underpaid, also their career may only last 5 years.
I doubt however that any of them are there fir the money. Power is worth a lot, lot more.
(localboy purveyor of pisspoor puns, Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:49, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

but like was said below, it's rarely their only career choice,
there is plenty they can go on to after the 5 years.
Money should be based on responsibility to a point, but if you're serving the public need, and the public are facing pay freezes and changes, surely you should be on level.
To be honest, i don't know enough about the expense changes to know if this is a pay rise, or a cut overall, with a pay rise to take over from other benefit losses.
( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:54, Reply)