data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
because there are two, both equally respected (in terms of the "respect" of the economists involved anyway) theories about which way this will go, and they are diametrically opposite.
It's almost - almost - as if economists don't have a fucking clue what will happen, what with economics being based entirely on precedent and there not being any, and are purely producing the most extreme scenarios in a desperate bid for attention. The Lady Gaga approach to economics, if you will.
( , Tue 10 Dec 2013, 10:27, 2 replies, latest was 11 years ago)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
( , Tue 10 Dec 2013, 10:31, Reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramjet
www.google.com/search?q=scramjet+plane&safe=off&espv=210&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=6e-mUoPWBIfxhQfasoGoAg&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=784
( , Tue 10 Dec 2013, 10:43, Reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
It would just be nice the cunts doing it would admit to this.
( , Tue 10 Dec 2013, 10:32, Reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
( , Tue 10 Dec 2013, 10:33, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread