I just think that most of what he posts is bollocks.
Just like *mvee. I don't get anything out of reading posts like that, so why shouldn't I filter them out? If that makes me a sad tosser or whatever, I couldnae care less.
( .Yeti., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 8:55, 4 replies, latest was 10 years ago)

Yeh but Mvee is a twat
whereas Meatsnake is TBOH
( Peej, Thu 26 Feb 2015, 8:58, Reply)

just seems like a very childish way to deal with a problem.
And means you're stopping others from possibly enjoying his content because you don't like him By keeping him out of threads. Maybe try being a grown up and just letting it go, rather than using a frankly bullshit tool on a message board.
( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:00, Reply)

I'm not going to agree with your logic on this one.
Granted, he can't post in any of the threads that I personally create, but those threads represent such a small percentage of the total content of B3ta that it's not as if I were throttling his access to the site. I'm not taking issue with your position; I know a lot of people are against the whole concept of 2.0, and choose not to use it. That's fine. Similarly, people who didn't put R*b F**rh*lm* on ignore presumably enjoyed reading his whiny attention-seeking on a weekly basis. I very quickly found it tiresome, and that was that. Just about every newspaper you can buy has pages in the back about football. Don't like football? Don't read them. It doesn't stop you buying the paper and financing the football pages, and it doesn't stop other people reading them.
( .Yeti., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:07, Reply)

yeah but it's your choice to not read them.
And you're very aware that at least here in OT it's one thread at a time. Those threads can last hours and you've decided you want to restrict his access because you don't like him. It's fine on qotw, or main board or links because there is a lot of content, but here, that's not true. One large thread at a time, and just because you don't like reading his stuff, you feel it's ok to exclude him like some sort of school play ground bollocks.
( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:11, Reply)

You seem like a 'fun' chap, shame I'm missing your quality input.

( MEATSNAKE Richard Hammond, Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:11, Reply)

just say youre doing it to fuck with these cunts
its the only language they understand
(Captain Give-A-Fuck #internetpals4eva, Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:12, Reply)

whats that supposed to mean?

( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:16, Reply)

so just don't read it

(old man river possible lesbian, Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:02, Reply)

Exactly, hence the 2.0

( .Yeti., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:07, Reply)

but that's not how 2.0 works because the devs were retards

(old man river possible lesbian, Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:11, Reply)

OK, serious question before this descends into a massive flamewar:
Does Ignore 1.0 still exist, and if so, how does it work? Because I have no objection whatsoever to Meatsnake or anyone else on my ignore list reading my posts and contributing to the discussion. My goal is not to build a tree house at the bottom of the garden with a sign nailed to the door saying "NO MEATSNAKE". I just don't want to read those contributions.
( .Yeti., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:39, Reply)

your only option is to just not read them

( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:40, Reply)

ur a nob lol

( MEATSNAKE Richard Hammond, Thu 26 Feb 2015, 9:47, Reply)