Two points
The argument against such images/media is that children are abused in the creation of them. If the images are solely drawings, cartoons or even 3D renders (such as with Poser software), a child is not harmed in any way.

Personally, I think it's all the same and is right to be illegal. But the argument used doesn't make sense in such instances.

Another talking point is that someone who gets convicted for pinching their secretary's arse is tarred with the same brush as Ian Huntley; ending up on the same register.

Or, you can legally have sex at 16, but don't be getting a camera out as that constitutes as creation of indecent images of children, possession and if you send your boy/girlfriend home with the pix, then you can include distribution.

Sex laws in this country are odd.
( sandettie light vessel automatic New Twitter - @bollocksreally, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 1:02, Reply)