Well yes, If the RK thing had been in the UK ect...
Was mostly using it as an example of what the various implications of the law could be given a similar sort of case - someone videoing or photographing police brutality for example. So, If I read that correctly it mostly applies to people who may be suspected of taking photgraphs for the purposes of Terrorism? IN the manner that may be useful for terrorism? Surely if you're doing that there's a fair few more things you could be arrested for than photographing a police officer? And thanks again for the clarified law and such.
(Fredz A graveyard of hopes, a dump of ambition, Fri 13 Feb 2009, 20:37, Reply)