Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
in comparison to some from my bro's wedding a while back. (year and a half I think)
quite a difference.
partly down to my amazing new suit, but partly due to other things too.
Photos in replies.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 14:06, 20 replies, latest was 17 years ago)
before

and after

edit: up yours Special K, I had to resize one of the pictures :-P
and do some work
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 14:10, Reply)
And Mrs Vipros looks very sophisticated. I expected your Mrs to look a bit more rock and roll, in a good way of course.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 14:33, Reply)
but isn't particularly rock and roll anyway, is getting there though.
it was more the significant weight loss on both our parts that I was referring to though ;-)
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 14:35, Reply)
I've not got much work to do this week :p
I like the pics though.
Although you seem to both be pulling exactly the same face in each! I think I need 100 photos of you, and some time to make an animated .gif :p
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 14:35, Reply)
her whole family is the same, smile applied with a rubber stamp.
I have a huge range of ridiculous expressions though, and it's pure chance that I managed to not look like a mong in those two!
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 14:39, Reply)
I've got my new suit for a wedding in June. It's not as nice as some of my others but I'm such a space hopper now I just took what I could find in my size (extra large fat bastard). If you are all very good boys and girls I won't post any pictures. You have been warned.
PS Looking good, both of you.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 14:44, Reply)
makes you look slimmer - unless you've become slimmer in the past year, of course. The suit is far better cut either way, in my humble opinion.
NB a stranger on the tube told me I look like Lemmy the other day, so sartorial judgements may not really be my specialised subject. Not quite sure how to take that, to be honest...
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 15:37, Reply)
but suit No. 2 is 3 times as expensive as suit No. 1 1.
I love my new suit.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 15:45, Reply)
although I do draw the line at white cowboy boots.
My teeth are all my own as well and I'm happy to be going grey and thus have left the Just For Men to Mr Kilmister...
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 15:47, Reply)
that's an important consideration for a Lemmy-alike
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 15:49, Reply)
Like a trainee Lemmy, perhaps...
If I can master the art of elecktrickery perhaps I will be able to post a couple of pics (which will need to be taken first).
Then we can put it to the vote.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 15:55, Reply)
make sure you take the photo in the standard Lemmy performance pose: legs spread wide, shouting at the sky
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 15:57, Reply)
Suit number two is exactly what I'm looking for for my sister's wedding...would you mind if I asked where you got it from? I explicitly want a two-button mid-grey three-piece - preferably one that could also be worn to work to justify expenditure.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 16:03, Reply)
My SG (Epiphone, sadly) will have to stand in for the Rickenbastard, however, which may spoil the effect.
Actually I do have a Westone Thunder somewhere which is more like it.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 16:04, Reply)
I got it in a place called Johnathan Hawkes in Exeter. Think it's just an independant shop, but I shall check for you.
www.jonathanhawkes.co.uk/suits.html
here is the website, they are incredibly helpful (and the girl in there is smokin' hot). The suit is a Remus Uomo if that helps.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 16:21, Reply)
I bought a rather nice little number from Burtons over the week - £140, 3 piece with free shirt, tie and boots :0)
Vipros, your new suit is very spanky. I like that one. And the weight loss is quite clear as well - I was going to mention that but someone else already did.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 16:27, Reply)
Exeter-based indeed but I'm sure I'll be able to find a Remus shop in Lahndan. Hopefully one with a smokin' hottie.
(, Mon 20 Apr 2009, 16:54, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »