I'd go for it
But you have serious QOTW issues, Friz. If I click a post it's because it's funny, or it hits a nail on the head or because I like it, which is why I click on Woodside's posts regularly for example.

Maybe put some more effort in to having a go yourself instead of crying foul so often?
(Bicycle Repairman "you're also a bit of a wanker", Mon 22 Jun 2009, 22:32, 1 reply, 17 years ago)

I never even try! In the last six months I've probably posted an answer say, three times
I try reading answers whilst the QOTW is still open, so I can try and judge them for myself. But lie after blatant lie, I get a bit annoyed.

I just thought this idea would make at least one lie-free QOTW.
(__, Mon 22 Jun 2009, 23:14, Reply)

You keep saying that all stories will be true for this QOTW
but how will you know the pictures are of that person?
You can take a picture of anyone from the internet and be like "lolz yeh, this was me being silly"
Just because it's a picture doesn't automatically make it real.
( Mellicious is made of candy, Mon 22 Jun 2009, 23:48, Reply)

Yes, but there's *less chance* of it being fake
For fuck's sake. It seems nobody is happy unless they can lie around these places.
(__, Tue 23 Jun 2009, 10:38, Reply)

I still don't understand
how a picture can make it less chance of being fake...
Unless you have seen the person in real life there is no way of knowing for sure that any pictures people put on the internet are actually them.
( Mellicious is made of candy, Tue 23 Jun 2009, 10:55, Reply)

Don't argue with them Mellicious.
They get upset.
( girlinthehole, Tue 23 Jun 2009, 11:05, Reply)

but it's so fun :(
( Mellicious is made of candy, Tue 23 Jun 2009, 11:17, Reply)

I could claim that I don't care, in caps

(__, Tue 23 Jun 2009, 14:23, Reply)