I liked the way you said there needed to be a huge consensus about climate change
like there wasn't one.
(PsychoChomp, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:00, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

ok, that was a pretty weak point
I'll grant you that. I'm still not convinced either way. Not that that matters a damn, but a lot of people seem to be awfully serious about stuff on the basis of what, on the face of it at least, seems to be some shaky science.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:02, Reply)

If I didn't know better I'd say this was a deliberate attempt to rile me.
I'll simply say that the most aggressivly anti-climate change goverment in the world set up a task force of the world's top scientists, experts and academics to prove that climate change was not due to carbon emissions.

Even then, specifically created to debunk this 'shaky-science' their findings were... well I'll leave the rest to you.
(Richard Earl of Cambridge Cruel, Savage, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:08, Reply)

got a reference for me?
serious question, and it wasn't an attempt to rile you.

I freely admit I don't know anywhere near enough about it.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:11, Reply)

Is this you?
c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/23/l_7d6c2d7ac46a488aa3308725dbd90de0.jpg
(Richard Earl of Cambridge Cruel, Savage, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:16, Reply)

You aren't the ginger one are you?
c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/56/l_2884b52164af491f8c71f16905c08728.jpg
(Richard Earl of Cambridge Cruel, Savage, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:17, Reply)

Don't worry I just want a picture of you so I can write
mongoloidism

on your face, to make myself stop shaking with rage.
(Richard Earl of Cambridge Cruel, Savage, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:18, Reply)

seems to be a bit of an over-reaction

( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:19, Reply)

It's an angry person
on the internet.
(Bazongaloid, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:20, Reply)

that is abundantly clear
do you have any kind of reference to this task force report that he was on about? I'd actually like to read about it.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:21, Reply)

GAAAAAAHHHHHHH
WHY DO YOU WIND ME UP LIKE THIS!!!!!

WHY!!!!

WHY!!!!!!!!!!
(Bazongaloid, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:21, Reply)

If someones opinion on the internet is getting you this angry
you have to turn off your computer and go outside and make some friends and talk to them.
(Bazongaloid, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:21, Reply)

CAN'T GO OUTSIDE
MUST BE ANGRY ONLINE RARARARRARARAR
( TGB checking Off Topic is still shit at, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:22, Reply)

it wasn't even an opinion
I said I wasn't convinced either way and that on the face of it the science seems shaky.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:22, Reply)

I think we have just talked to somone online
who is about to commit a serious bunch of murder offline.
(Bazongaloid, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:24, Reply)

Instead of those comedy
mass murder events.
( TGB checking Off Topic is still shit at, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:26, Reply)

oh crap
we've had enough publicity recently.

and he hasn't answered my question. I can find plenty of reference to people suggesting what to me sound like very reasonable reasons why we aren't affecting the climate, and not a great deal that is persuasive otherwise.

do you think that in saying that I am making things worse?
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:26, Reply)

seems to be
strangely, I'm not sure I've ever seen that photo before
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 16 Jul 2009, 16:18, Reply)