why would you want to ruin it with that frilly crap

( Lisette von Falcon, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:09, 1 reply, 17 years ago)

it's for opening special locks
in fact I wouldn't. I was just trying to take a guess at the one you had found.

I failed :-(
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:10, Reply)

that's ugly :(
it's this that I want
( Lisette von Falcon, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:13, Reply)

ignoring the crap all over the one I linked, they aren't that different
as reasonably pointless items go though, the one you linked is quite nice.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:14, Reply)

yeah I know I know
but I like both and for the price of the one you linked I could buy three of the same without the frills
OH HOW I LOVE SKELETON KEYS!
I have four brass ones with gorgeous designs.
PLUS Tiffany & Co has released a collection of skeleton keys that go on necklaces OH HOW I WANT ONE!
( Lisette von Falcon, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:18, Reply)

I didn't look at the price
so what you say is perfectly sensible

I don't think I collect anything really. I'll have to say guitars, but I only have 3 and a bass. and a mandolin.

I want more though, so that probably does count
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:19, Reply)

I think it should count if you have more than two.
But guitars are expensive so I think you've got a good sized collection.
( Lisette von Falcon, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:22, Reply)

awesome
it is about 2.5 grands worth, so I guess it does count as a fairly solid collection
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:26, Reply)

I HAVE A KEY LIKE THAT!
My house is really old. The cupboard on the landing has the original old door and key (I think it used to be where they kept coal.)
I was amazed when I saw it, and the fact that it still works and is in use.
( Roota zweeeeeoooooowm, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:23, Reply)

uugghhh *jealouses*
thats so awesome
( Lisette von Falcon, Thu 1 Oct 2009, 16:38, Reply)