Get a "1080p" one with at least 3 HDMI ports.
It's worth spending a bit more for that, as it futureproofs the whole thing for the next 10 years or soo.

The only reason for holding back these days is this '3D' thing they're bringing out next year, but the examples of it that I've seen are rubbish.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:03, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

I think your wise advice has made my decision
just need to see if richer sounds have one in stock
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:06, Reply)

I have a mate
who worked until recently for Sky. They are OBSESSED with 3D TV but acknowledge that until the need for silly glasses is removed it will remain strictly a novelty.

Do you really want to watch EastEnders in 3D?

Or even at all?
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:13, Reply)

3D is only good for kids' film at the cinema.
That Channel4 3D was pony.
It hurt my eyes and looked like a collage.
( Roota zweeeeeoooooowm, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:17, Reply)

couldn't agree more
why have you suddenly started using lots of rhyming slang?
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:19, Reply)

I always use rhyming slang
But I thought that ^ was the first instance today.
My dad taught me loads when I was a kid. My favourite is handing someone a drink and saying "Here, get that down your Gregory Peck."
That's my absolute favourite.
( Roota zweeeeeoooooowm, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:32, Reply)

you said "jar of glue" earlier
which I quite liked.

gregory peck is a good one :-)
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:38, Reply)

Goodness, so I did!

( Roota zweeeeeoooooowm, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:40, Reply)

I've seen the tellys without glasses, they're really shit.
In a typical scene, it takes about a minuite to realise it's 3D, and by then it's changed.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 30 Nov 2009, 14:25, Reply)