Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
You are a process engineer. Does that not mean you make science work for a useful purpose? You trust what they tell you because when you replicate it, and the process works, you have solid evidence that they are right.
In climate change there is insufficient evidence, and may never be until the last scientist croaks his last words, "I told you so."
Your task is to evaluate what you can see, and there are plenty of records going back hundreds of years showing what the climate was alike at different locations.
I personally do not remember the ice age, but I think I know it happened, because there seems to be evidence to substantiate it happening.
(, Wed 2 Dec 2009, 8:14, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
There's a shitload of evidence supporting global warming. It is happening, no question. It's part of the natural global cycles and in recent years the temperatures have been increasing more rapidly.
What there is doubt about is how much (if any) of it is a direct result of human activity. But the evidence is strongly in favour of anthropological effects.
(, Wed 2 Dec 2009, 8:17, Reply)
I meant evidence that human activity was primary cause
(, Wed 2 Dec 2009, 9:02, Reply)
I believe it if it can be proved. And they can't prove it. They have no way to demonstrate that the climate change (if it's happening; this year is being colder than last) is our fault.
As I've said a lot of times already, I'm all for reducing or stoping the waste. Recycle and reuse. Don't take your car when you can walk or use public transport. Don't leave your lights on.
On the same manner, at work, I'm all for reducing emissions and design equipment as environmentaly friendly as possible.
I don't like people scaring me and using "scientific prove" that hasn't been proved to make me do things and act!! I don't like the blackmail!!
(, Wed 2 Dec 2009, 8:19, Reply)
I'm sorry, I'm taken... But as I said before, if my bf doesn't propose soon I'll let you know.
(, Wed 2 Dec 2009, 8:34, Reply)
That'd be to confuse weather with climate.
Imagine a wavy line running left-to-right. Now tilt it, so the right end is higher than the left. It's still possible for point p on the x-axis to be higher on the y-axis than p+1, though the trend would still be for the values represented on the x-axis to be proporional to those on the y.
Apologies for lack of correct terminology. I hope you get the picture, though.
(, Wed 2 Dec 2009, 10:50, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread